Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 101, P67-74, October 2022

Download started.

Ok

Cognition, adaptive skills and epilepsy disability/severity in patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome undergoing deep brain stimulation for epilepsy in the ESTEL trial

  • Linda J. Dalic
    Correspondence
    Correspondence author at: Department of Medicine (Austin Health), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg VIC 3084, Australia.
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine (Austin Health), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg VIC 3084, Australia

    Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Aaron E.L. Warren
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine (Austin Health), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg VIC 3084, Australia

    The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Charles B. Malpas
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia

    Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Wesley Thevathasan
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine (Austin Health), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg VIC 3084, Australia

    Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia

    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Annie Roten
    Affiliations
    Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kristian J. Bulluss
    Affiliations
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia

    Department of Neurosurgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia

    Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • John S. Archer
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine (Austin Health), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg VIC 3084, Australia

    Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia

    The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • Cognitive and behavioral testing in patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) can be challenging.
      • As part of the ESTEL trial (thalamic DBS in LGS), we performed cognitive and behavioral measurements in 19 patients with LGS pre- and post-DBS treatment.
      • After 3-months of stimulation, caregiver-reported epilepsy severity (GASE) and disability (GAD) improved.
      • We did not find CM-DBS caused a decline in cognition, adaptive skills, epilepsy disability, quality of life or depression scores.
      • Raw scores appeared to better reflect caregiver reported changes in performance than standardized scores, due to their greater dynamic range.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      We previously reported seizure and EEG outcomes of the ESTEL study (Electrical Stimulation of Thalamus for Epilepsy of Lennox–Gastaut phenotype). To assess potential cognitive and behavioral changes during chronic, duty-cycle stimulation of bilateral thalamic centromedian nucleus, we compared standardized cognitive and behavioral measurements, as well as caregiver assessments of disability/severity, before implantation and after 3-months stimulation.

      Methods

      Twenty patients with LGS (17–37 years;13 females) were studied; one participant was not randomized due to DBS device removal, with outcomes of 19 remaining participants reported here. Cognitive and behavioral measurements were performed at baseline (i.e., before DBS implantation), at the end of the blinded stimulation phase, and at study exit. Instruments measured cognition (NIH toolbox cognitive battery, NIHTB-CB), adaptive skills (ABAS-3), epilepsy severity (GASE) and disability (GAD), quality of life (QOLIE-31), and depression (PHQ-9). Changes in scores after 3-months of stimulation relative to baseline were explored using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests.

      Results

      After 3-months of stimulation, caregiver-reported epilepsy severity (GASE) and disability (GAD) improved (p<0.05). No other instrument showed a significant change from baseline. Measurements that required direct participant involvement, rather than caregivers, was completed by only a subset of higher-functioning individuals (NIHTB-CB, n = 13; QOLIE-31, n = 3; and PHQ-9, n = 6). In addition to cognitive impairments, behavioral and physical limitations were common obstacles to instrument completion. Standardized scores were hindered by ‘floor effects’; however, raw scores better reflected clinical impressions of participants’ functioning and were more sensitive to caregiver-reported changes following treatment.

      Conclusion

      DBS treatment is associated with reduced epilepsy severity and disability in young adults with LGS. Performing cognitive and behavioral outcome measurement in patients with cognitive impairment is challenging but possible and requires careful selection of instruments and modifications of score interpretation to avoid floor effects.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Seizure - European Journal of Epilepsy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Arzimanoglou A.
        • French J.
        • Blume W.T.
        • Cross J.H.
        • Ernst J.-P.
        • Feucht M.
        • et al.
        Lennox–Gastaut syndrome: a consensus approach on diagnosis, assessment, management, and trial methodology.
        Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8: 82-93
        • Chevrie J.
        • Aicardi J.
        Childhood epileptic encephalopathy with slow spike-wave. A statistical study of 80 cases.
        Epilepsia. 1972; 13: 259-271
        • Markand O.N.
        Slow spike-wave activity in EEG and associated clinical features: often called ‘Lennox’ or ‘Lennox–Gastaut’ syndrome.
        Neurology. 1977; 27 (746-757)
        • Yamatogi Y.
        • Ohtahara S.
        Age-dependent epileptic encephalopathy: a longitudinal study.
        Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1981; 35: 321-332
        • Trevathan E.
        • Murphy C.C.
        • Yeargin-Allsopp M.
        Prevalence and descriptive epidemiology of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome among Atlanta children.
        Epilepsia. 1997; 38: 1283-1288
        • Kim H.J.
        • Kim H.D.
        • Lee J.S.
        • Heo K.
        • Kim D.S.
        • Kang H.C.
        Long-term prognosis of patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome in recent decades.
        Epilepsy Res. 2015; 110: 10-19
        • Oguni H.
        • Hayashi K.
        • Osawa M.
        Long-term prognosis of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome.
        Epilepsia. 1996; 37: 44-47
        • Yagi K.
        Evolution of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome: a long-term longitudinal study.
        Epilepsia. 1996; 37: 48-51
        • Hoffmann-Riem M.
        • Diener W.
        • Benninger C.
        • Rating D.
        • Unnebrink K.
        • Stephani U.
        • et al.
        Nonconvulsive status epilepticus—a possible cause of mental retardation in patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome.
        Neuropediatrics. 2000; 31: 169-174
        • Erba G.
        • Cavazzuti V.
        Ictal and interictal response-latency in Lennox–Gastaut syndrome.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1977; 42: 717
        • Ogawa K.
        • Kanemoto K.
        • Ishii Y.
        • Koyama M.
        • Shirasaka Y.
        • Kawasaki J.
        • et al.
        Long-term follow-up study of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome in patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities: with special reference to the problem of dysphagia.
        Seizure. 2001; 10: 197-202
        • Boel M.J.
        Behavioral and neuropsychological problems in refractory paediatric epilepsies.
        Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2004; 8: 291-297
        • Samanta D.
        Management of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome beyond childhood: a comprehensive review.
        Epilepsy Behav. 2021; 114107612
        • Dalic L.J.
        • Warren A.E.L.
        • Bulluss K.J.
        • Thevathasan W.
        • Roten A.
        • Churilov L.
        • et al.
        DBS of thalamic centromedian nucleus for Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (ESTEL trial).
        Ann Neurol. 2022; 91: 253-267
        • Velasco A.L.
        • Velasco F.
        • Jiménez F.
        • Velasco M.
        • Castro G.
        • Carrillo-Ruiz J.D.
        • et al.
        Neuromodulation of the centromedian thalamic nuclei in the treatment of generalized seizures and the improvement of the quality of life in patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome.
        Epilepsia. 2006; 47: 1203-1212
        • Fisher R.S.
        • Uematsu S.
        • Krauss G.L.
        • Cysyk B.J.
        • McPherson R.
        • Lesser R.P.
        • et al.
        Placebo-controlled pilot study of centromedian thalamic stimulation in treatment of intractable seizures.
        Epilepsia. 1992; 33: 841-851
        • Couzens D.
        • Cuskelly M.
        • Jobling A.
        The Stanford Binet fourth edition and its use with individuals with down syndrome: cautions for clinicians.
        Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2004; 51: 39-56
        • Facon B.
        A cross-sectional test of the similar-trajectory hypothesis among adults with mental retardation.
        Res Dev Disabil. 2008; 29: 29-44
        • Hessl D.
        • Nguyen D.V.
        • Green C.
        • Chavez A.
        • Tassone F.
        • Hagerman R.J.
        • et al.
        A solution to limitations of cognitive testing in children with intellectual disabilities: the case of fragile X syndrome.
        J Neurodev Disord. 2009; 1: 33-45
        • Warren A.E.L.
        • Dalic L.J.
        • Thevathasan W.
        • Roten A.
        • Bulluss K.J.
        • Archer J.
        Targeting the centromedian thalamic nucleus for deep brain stimulation.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020; 91: 339-349
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Bruns D.E.
        • Gatsonis C.A.
        • Glasziou P.P.
        • Irwig L.M.
        • et al.
        The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.
        Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: W1-12
        • Gershon R.C.
        • Wagster M.V.
        • Hendrie H.C.
        • Fox N.A.
        • Cook K.F.
        • Nowinski C.J.
        NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function.
        Neurology. 2013; 80: S2-S6
        • Weintraub S.
        • Dikmen S.S.
        • Heaton R.K.
        • Tulsky D.S.
        • Zelazo P.D.
        • Slotkin J.
        • et al.
        The cognition battery of the NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function: validation in an adult sample.
        J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014; 20: 567-578
        • Zelazo P.D.
        • Anderson J.E.
        • Richler J.
        • Wallner-Allen K.
        • Beaumont J.L.
        • Conway K.P.
        • et al.
        NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): validation of executive function measures in adults.
        J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014; 20: 620-629
        • Shields R.H.
        • Kaat A.J.
        • McKenzie F.J.
        • Drayton A.
        • Sansone S.M.
        • Coleman J.
        • et al.
        Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability.
        Neurology. 2020; 94: e1229-e1240
        • Harrison P.
        • Oakland T.
        Adaptive Behavior Assessment System—Third Edition.
        San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, 2015
        • Woolf S.
        • Woolf C.M.
        • Oakland T.
        Adaptive behavior among adults with intellectual disabilities and its relationship to community independence.
        Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010; 48: 209-215
        • Sajobi T.T.
        • Jette N.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Patten S.B.
        • Fiest K.M.
        • Engbers J.D.
        • et al.
        Determinants of disease severity in adults with epilepsy: results from the Neurological Diseases and Depression Study.
        Epilepsy Behav. 2015; 51: 170-175
        • Sajobi T.T.
        • Jette N.
        • Fiest K.M.
        • Patten S.B.
        • Engbers J.D.
        • Lowerison M.W.
        • et al.
        Correlates of disability related to seizures in persons with epilepsy.
        Epilepsia. 2015; 56: 1463-1469
        • Chan C.J.
        • Zou G.
        • Wiebe S.
        • Speechley K.N.
        Global assessment of the severity of epilepsy (GASE) scale in children: validity, reliability, responsiveness.
        Epilepsia. 2015; 56: 1950-1956
        • Puka K.
        • Bax K.
        • Andrade A.
        • Devries-Rizzo M.
        • Gangam H.
        • Levin S.
        • et al.
        A live-online mindfulness-based intervention for children living with epilepsy and their families: protocol for a randomized controlled trial of Making Mindfulness Matter(c).
        Trials. 2020; 21: 922
        • Cramer J.A.
        • Perrine K.
        • Devinsky O.
        • Bryant-Comstock L.
        • Meador K.
        • Hermann B.
        Development and cross-cultural translations of a 31-item quality of life in epilepsy inventory.
        Epilepsia. 1998; 39: 81-88
        • Rathore J.S.
        • Jehi L.E.
        • Fan Y.
        • Patel S.I.
        • Foldvary-Schaefer N.
        • Ramirez M.J.
        • et al.
        Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression screening in adults with epilepsy.
        Epilepsy Behav. 2014; 37: 215-220
        • Fisher R.
        • Salanova V.
        • Witt T.
        • Worth R.
        • Henry T.
        • Gross R.
        • et al.
        Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy.
        Epilepsia. 2010; 51: 899-908
        • Thiele E.A.
        • Marsh E.D.
        • French J.A.
        • Mazurkiewicz-Beldzinska M.
        • Benbadis S.R.
        • Joshi C.
        • et al.
        Cannabidiol in patients with seizures associated with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (GWPCARE4): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
        Lancet. 2018; 391: 1085-1096
        • Operto F.F.
        • Verrotti A.
        • Marrelli A.
        • Ciuffini R.
        • Coppola G.
        • Pastorino G.M.G.
        • et al.
        Cognitive, adaptive, and behavioral effects of adjunctive rufinamide in Lennox–Gastaut syndrome: a prospective observational clinical study.
        Epilepsy Behav. 2020; 112107445
        • Auvin S.
        • Dozieres B.
        • Ilea A.
        • Delanoe C.
        Use of perampanel in children and adolescents with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome.
        Epilepsy Behav. 2017; 74: 59-63
        • Besag F.M.
        Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of epileptic syndromes: implications for education and clinical practice.
        Epilepsia. 2006; 47: 119-125
        • Berg A.T.
        • Gaebler-Spira D.
        • Wilkening G.
        • Zelko F.
        • Knupp K.
        • Dixon-Salazar T.
        • et al.
        Nonseizure consequences of Dravet syndrome, KCNQ2-DEE, KCNB1-DEE, Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, ESES: a functional framework.
        Epilepsy Behav. 2020; 111107287
        • Lord C.
        • Risi S.
        • Lambrecht L.
        • Cook E.H.
        • Leventhal B.L.
        • DiLavore P.C.
        • et al.
        The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism.
        J Autism Dev Disord. 2000; 30 (Jr): 205-223
        • Berg A.T.
        • Palac H.
        • Wilkening G.
        • Zelko F.
        • Schust Meyer L
        SCN2A-Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies: challenges to trial-readiness for non-seizure outcomes.
        Epilepsia. 2021; 62: 258-268
        • Alcala-Zermeno J.L.
        • Gregg N.M.
        • Wirrell E.C.
        • Stead M.
        • Worrell G.A.
        • Van Gompel J.J.
        • et al.
        Centromedian thalamic nucleus with or without anterior thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for epilepsy in children and adults: a retrospective case series.
        Seizure. 2021; 84: 101-107
        • Salanova V.
        • Sperling M.R.
        • Gross R.E.
        • Irwin C.P.
        • Vollhaber J.A.
        • Giftakis J.E.
        • et al.
        The SANTE study at 10 years of follow-up: effectiveness, safety, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.
        Epilepsia. 2021;
        • Bahmani Z.
        • Clark K.
        • Merrikhi Y.
        • Mueller A.
        • Pettine W.
        • Isabel Vanegas M.
        • et al.
        Prefrontal contributions to attention and working memory.
        Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2019; 41: 129-153
        • Funahashi S.
        Prefrontal cortex and working memory processes.
        Neuroscience. 2006; 139: 251-261
        • Warren A.E.
        • Abbott D.F.
        • Vaughan D.N.
        • Jackson G.D.
        • Archer J.S.
        Abnormal cognitive network interactions in Lennox–Gastaut syndrome: a potential mechanism of epileptic encephalopathy.
        Epilepsia. 2016; 57: 812-822