Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 13, ISSUE 8, P537-548, December 2004

The investigation of syncope

      Abstract

      Patients with syncope are usually referred to either neurology or cardiology clinics, yet the facilities for detailed syncope investigation are mostly in cardiac units. The diagnosis rests principally upon the history, but investigations may be required to support the clinical diagnosis. Close collaboration between the epilepsy clinician and a cardiologist is essential for effective investigation and safe management of syncope. It is frequently misdiagnosed and often erroneously treated as epilepsy. Furthermore, it is potentially a marker of sudden death when associated with certain cardiac disorders. Here we review the main syncope types and explore diagnostic approaches.

      Keywords

      Introduction

      Syncope is an abrupt and transient loss of consciousness associated with loss of postural tone that follows a sudden fall in cerebral perfusion. Recurrent syncope is commoner than epilepsy (syncope prevalence 3–37%;
      • Dermaksian G.
      • Lamb L.E.
      Syncope in a population of healthy young adults.
      • Savage D.D.
      • Corwin L.
      • McGee D.L.
      • et al.
      Epidemiologic features of isolated syncope: the Framingham Study.
      epilepsy prevalence 0.5%
      • Hauser W.A.
      • Annegers J.F.
      • Kurland L.T.
      The incidence of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1935–84.
      ) and accounts for 3% of emergency department visits and 1% of hospital admissions.
      • Kapoor W.N.
      Evaluation and outcome of patients with syncope.
      Recent work has shown that syncope is often misdiagnosed and erroneously treated as epilepsy.
      • Chadwick D.
      • Smith D.
      The misdiagnosis of epilepsy.
      The diagnosis rests principally upon the history, but investigations may be required to support the clinical diagnosis. Because the range of underlying causes of syncope is wide, the physician’s first task is to distinguish between the usually benign, e.g. vasovagal syncope, and the potentially life threatening, e.g. cardiac syncope.
      Neurologists may have limited access to the range of cardiac investigations that may be necessary to clarify the cause and treatment of syncope. Close collaboration between the epilepsy clinician and a cardiologist is essential for safe management of these patients.

      Syncope types

      The main causes of syncope are shown in Table 1. In approximately one-third of cases, a presumptive diagnosis can be made on the basis of the clinical history, physical examination and 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG). The diagnosis is undetermined in two-thirds of cases, termed syncope of undetermined origin (SUO). Even after detailed investigation, the cause remains unexplained in a one-third of all patients.
      • Schnipper J.L.
      • Kapoor W.N.
      Diagnostic evaluation and management of patients with syncope.
      Table 1Causes and classification of syncope.
      Neurally-mediated reflex syncope
       • Vasovagal syncope
       • Reflex syncope with specific precipitants
        Carotid sinus syndrome
        Other situational, e.g. cough, micturition, swallowing
      Orthostatic syncope (autonomic failure)
       • Primary (e.g. multiple system atrophy)
       • Secondary (diabetes, amyloid, drugs)
      Cardiac syncope
       • Tachyarrhythmias
        Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia
        Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
        SVT with rapid ventricular rate
       • Bradyarrhythmias
        Impulse generation (e.g. sinus node diseases)
        Impulse conduction (e.g. complete heart block)
       • Mechanical obstruction
        Aortic stenosis
        Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
        Mitral stenosis
        Atrial myxoma
      Central nervous system syncope
       • Ictal arrhythmia
       • Intermittent obstructive hydrocephalus
       • Transient ischaemic attacks
       • Migraine
      Metabolic syncope
       • Hypoglycaemia
       • Hypocalcaemia
      Psychogenic syncope
       • Panic disorder
       • Conversion
      Syncope of undetermined origin (SUO)

      Neurally-mediated (reflex) syncope

      Neurally-mediated syncope describes loss of consciousness associated with reflex vasodilation and bradycardia occurring as a response to certain triggers. Most neurally-mediated reflex syncope can be categorised as vasovagal syncope, but there are subgroups where syncope is provoked only by specific triggers, e.g. coughing or swallowing.

      Vasovagal syncope

      Reflex (vasovagal) syncope is the commonest cause of syncope. It is generally benign and is the usual explanation for fainting in otherwise healthy individuals of all ages, but especially children and young adults. A patient’s vasovagal tendency also influences the likelihood and severity of syncope developing from seemingly unrelated causes, e.g. aortic stenosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In vasovagal syncope, the blood pressure (BP) and heart rate are typically maintained until a sudden haemodynamic collapse.

      Clinical features

      The main clinical features that distinguish vasovagal syncope from seizures
      • Smith P.E.M.
      If it’s not epilepsy….
      are shown in Table 2.
      • Situations and triggers. Patients may report certain precipitants that suggest the diagnosis. Vasovagal syncope might occur in the bathroom, at night or in a hot restaurant; specific triggers include prolonged standing, hot crowded environments, emotional trauma and pain. In susceptible individuals, coughing, swallowing or micturition may provoke vasovagal syncope. Exercise-induced vasovagal syncope must be investigated in detail to distinguish it from cardiac syncope.
        • Sneddon J.F.
        • Scalia G.
        • Ward D.E.
        • et al.
        Exercise induced vasodepressor syncope.
      • Prodrome. Warning symptoms (presyncope) that develop over 1–5 min include lightheadness, nausea, sweating, greying or blacking of vision, muffled hearing, and feeling distant.
      • Index event. During the period of unconsciousness, a witness may describe pallor, sweating, cold skin, and brief convulsive jerks.
        • Lempert T.
        • Bauer M.
        • Schmidt D.
        Syncope: a videometric analysis of 56 episodes of transient cerebral hypoxia.
        Incontinence and injury are uncommon, and lateral tongue biting rare.
      • Recovery. Any post-ictal confusion is typically brief, usually a few seconds, unless there had been associated head trauma. Although patients with neurally-mediated syncope are orientated soon after recovery, they are typically fatigued for minutes to hours afterwards, in contrast to patients with cardiac syncope who recover completely almost immediately on regaining consciousness.
      Table 2Clinical distinction of neurally-mediated reflex (vasovagal) syncope seizures and cardiac syncope.
      Vasovagal syncopeSeizureCardiac syncope
      TriggerCommon (upright, bathroom, blood, needles)Rare (flashing lights, hyperventilation)Rare, exertional (consider left ventricular outflow obstruction)
      ProdromeAlmost always (presyncope)Common (aura)Uncommon or brief
      OnsetGradual (often minutes)Usually suddenUsually sudden
      Duration1–30 s1–3 minVariable
      Convulsive jerksCommon (brief)Common (prolonged)Common (brief)
      IncontinenceUncommonCommonUncommon
      Lateral tongue biteVery rareCommonVery rare
      ColourVery pale, cold skinPale or flushed (partial seizure); blue (tonic-clonic seizure)Very pale, cold skin
      Post-ictal confusionRare (wakes on floor)Common (wakes in ambulance)Rare (wakes on the floor)
      RecoveryQuickly orientatedSlow (confused)Quickly orientated
      Fatigue (minutes-hours)Fatigue (minutes-hours)No fatigue

      Vasovagal syncope with specific triggers

      Cough syncope, micturition syncope, swallow syncope, etc. are variants of vasovagal syncope where certain specific situations act as powerful triggers to vagal-mediated haemodynamic collapse.

      Carotid sinus syndrome

      Patients with carotid sinus syndrome have exaggerated baroreceptor-mediated reflexes, leading to symptomatic bradycardia and hypotension. It is rare below aged 50 years, but is an important yet frequently overlooked cause of syncope in the elderly. If is specifically sought, carotid sinus syndrome is diagnosed in about 14% of elderly patients presenting with suspected presyncope or syncope.

      Morley CA, Perrin EJ, Grant et al. Carotid sinus syndrome treated by pacing. Analysis of persistent symptoms and role of atrio-ventricular sequential pacing. Br Heart 1982;47:411–18.

      Carotid sinus hypersensitivity (carotid sinus massage resulting in 3 s asystole) is a common finding in elderly individuals and, in general, more malignant causes of syncope (e.g. scar-related ventricular tachycardia) should be considered before a diagnosis of carotid sinus syndrome is made.

      Clinical features

      Carotid sinus syndrome presents, usually in the elderly, with dizziness, syncope or falls, often with injury. Important precipitating factors include head movements (especially with tight neckwear or neck pathology), prolonged standing, heavy meals, or straining on micturition, defecation and coughing.

      Cardiac syncope

      Cardiac syncope results from disorders of either cardiac rhythm or cardiac structure (Table 1). Disorders of cardiac rhythm are the second most common cause of syncope. Tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias can result in a sudden precipitous reduction in cardiac output resulting in loss of consciousness with little warning. Tachyarrhythmias can occur in a heterogeneous group of individuals. Patients with significant structural heart disease (e.g. history of prior myocardial infarction) and scar-related ventricular tachycardia are at high risk of sudden cardiac death due to a cardiac arrest (10–20% annual risk). Patients with genetic disorders such as congenital long QT syndrome (Fig. 1) or Brugada syndrome (Fig. 2) can present with syncope and apparently normal hearts and be at risk of sudden and unexpected death. At the other end of the spectrum are patients with structurally normal hearts and regular forms of supraventricular tachycardia (e.g. AV node-dependent tachycardia) who may present with syncope rather than palpitations. Bradyarrhythmias occur mainly in the elderly due to degenerative changes (fibrosis) of the sinus node or the specialised conducting tissue (AV node or His-Purkinje tissue). Evidence of conduction system disease such as complete left bundle branch block, trifascicular heart block or evidence of sinus node dysfunction such as pauses alternating with atrial tachyarrhythmias (tachy-brady syndrome) increase the possibility that syncope is due to a bradyarrhythmias. Less commonly cardiac syncope can be caused by mechanical obstruction to either left ventricular outflow (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, aortic stenosis) or left ventricular inflow (mitral stenosis, atrial myxoma).
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1ECG demonstrating long QT syndrome. Note that the QT interval extends from the start of the QRS complex to the end of the T wave, and normally shortens with increased heart rates. The corrected QT interval (QTc) can be derived from the equation QTc=QT/√RR interval (normal=0.46 s in males and 0.47 s in females). This is the ECG from a patient with inherited long QT syndrome. The corrected QT interval is 0.61 s. Reproduced with permission from: JAMA 2003;289(16):2042.
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2Precordial leads of an ECG demonstrating the Brugada pattern: persistent ST elevation in the right ventricular precordial leads (V1–V3), more evident on V2 (arrow). Reproduced with permission from: JACC 2003;41(10):1666.

      Clinical features

      Cardiac syncope can occur from any posture. There is usually little warning and recovery is rapid. Frequently syncope due to tachyarrhythmias occurs with no perception of palpitations. Syncope should always be considered due to a life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia in any patient with prior history of myocardial infarction, history of heart failure, or a family history of sudden, unexpected death at a young age (<40 years). Such cases require urgent cardiological assessment. Mechanical obstruction should always be excluded in patients with exertional syncope; however, the majority of patients with conditions such as aortic stenosis or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy experience syncope either at rest or during low-level activity. Finally, a detailed drug history should be obtained to assess if the patient is on any drug associated with acquired form of long QT syndrome.

      Orthostatic syncope

      Orthostatic hypotension is where autonomic dysfunction impairs the normal vasoconstriction responses to a postural BP fall, allowing a postural fall in systolic BP exceeding 20 mmHg within seconds or a few minutes of standing. Orthostatic syncope occurs most often in the elderly but may accompany any autonomic peripheral neuropathy (diabetes, alcohol, amyloidosis) or complex autonomic failure (e.g. multiple system atrophy). Associated dysautonomic symptoms include impotence, urinary incontinence, nocturnal diarrhoea and constipation. Certain medications may exacerbate the problem, especially antihypertensives, diuretics, tricyclic antidepressants and anti-Parkinsonian treatment.

      Clinical features

      Orthostatic syncope occurs within seconds or minutes of becoming upright, typically on rising and after meals. Unlike in vasovagal syncope, the skin stays warm, the heart rate is unchanged despite the BP fall, and sweating is absent. Measurements of BP and heart rate both lying and standing are usually sufficient to confirm the diagnosis.

      Central nervous system (CNS) syncope

      These are rare causes of syncope.

      Clinical features

      • Seizure-induced arrhythmogenic syncope results from heart rate and rhythm changes during seizures.
        • Freeman R.
        • Schachter S.C.
        Autonomic epilepsy.
        Tachycardias commonly accompany seizures, though rarely lead to symptoms.
        • Blumhardt L.D.
        • Smith P.E.M.
        • Owen L.
        Electrocardiographic accompaniments of temporal lobe epileptic seizures.
        Bradyarrhythmias are rarer, usually associated with left sided partial seizure onset,
        • Tinuper P.
        • Bisulli F.
        • Cerullo A.
        • et al.
        Ictal bradycardia in partial epileptic seizures: autonomic investigation in three cases and literature review.
        and lead to loss of consciousness which is syncopal rather than primarily due to the seizure.
        • Constantin I.
        • Martins J.B.
        • Fincham R.W.
        • et al.
        Bradycardia and syncope as manifestations of partial epilepsy.
        • Howell S.J.
        • Blumhardt L.D.
        Cardiac asystole associated with epileptic seizures: a case report with simultaneous EEG and ECG.
        Such cases are often initially diagnosed as cardiac arrhythmogenic syncope, but partial seizures continue without collapse following cardiac pacing.
      • Intermittent obstructive hydrocephalus, e.g. third ventricular cyst or Chiari malformation, typically, though not invariably, present as occipital “pressure” headaches building over seconds before loss of consciousness. Colloid cysts of the third ventricle may present as “drop attacks” (without loss of consciousness) owing to stretching of the corticospinal fibres supplying the lower limbs. Intermittent elevation of intracranial pressure is a potential cause of sudden death.
      • Transient ischaemic attacks rarely lead to loss of consciousness, and then only with involvement of the posterior circulation; there are usually associated brainstem symptoms including vertigo, ataxia, diplopia, and parasthesiae. A history of hypertension and vascular disease is usual.
      • Migraine syncope usually manifests as a gradual onset loss of consciousness in the context of other migraine symptoms and is typically associated with familial hemiplegic migraine. Basilar artery migraine presents with syncope (commonly prolonged), typically preceded by visual blackening, vertigo, or diplopia.

      Psychogenic syncope

      Psychological disorders may present as syncope. The two main causes are panic (especially with hyperventilation) and dissociative (conversion) disorders. Non-epileptic attacks and syncope may also coexist in the same patient, sometimes prompting aggressive treatment of apparently resistant syncope.

      Clinical features

      • Panic disorder may cause attacks that culminate in true syncope through hyperventilation-induced hypocapnia with cerebral vasoconstriction. Facial and limb tingling are typical, and may be lateralised. Accompanying symptoms include anxiety, light-headedness, breathlessness, palpitation, chest and throat tightness, blurred vision and carpopedal spasms.
      • Dissociative non-epileptic attack disorder (pseudoseizures) may mimic recurrent syncope. The condition is notoriously difficult to diagnose and carries significant resource implications and potential unnecessary morbidity if overlooked. Major features distinguishing pseudoseizures from epileptic seizures include prolonged duration, normal colour and breathing (or hyperventilation) during attacks, erratic movements, fighting, pelvic thrusting, back arching, crying, and the absence of tongue biting, self-injury or post-ictal confusion.

      Metabolic syncope

      Syncope sometimes results from metabolic disturbances. Hypoglycaemia, easily diagnosed and readily reversed, should be considered in all patients with undiagnosed altered consciousness. Insulin-treated diabetes mellitus is the obvious cause. Insulinoma is rare and frequently missed. Other metabolic disorders, e.g. hypocalcaemia, may present as pre-syncope and rarely syncope.

      Clinical features

      Hypoglycaemic syncope presents as recurrent blackouts, often with behaviour disturbance, confusion and convulsions. Insulinoma-related neuroglycopenia occurs especially in sleep and in the early morning, and are associated with weight gain from frequent sweet drinks. Hypocalcaemia (e.g. from hypoparathyroidism) may present as recurrent episodes of tingling, carpopedal spasm and syncope.

      Investigations

      The clinical history, physical examination, and electrocardiography (ECG) are essential in the initial evaluation of a patient with syncope. After these are completed, about 45% of patients have a definite diagnosis, and a further 8% have a presumptive diagnosis that can be confirmed by directed testing.
      • Savage D.D.
      • Corwin L.
      • McGee D.L.
      • et al.
      Epidemiologic features of isolated syncope: the Framingham Study.
      Such is the diversity of underlying causes of syncope, however, that the investigations must be selected from a broad range of possible tests. Fig. 3 gives an algorithm outlining suggested investigation pathways (modified from the American College of Cardiology, 1999
      • Linzer M.
      • Yang E.H.
      • Estes III, N.A.
      Diagnosing syncope: Part 1. Value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical Efficacy Project of the American College of Physicians.
      • Linzer M.
      • Yang E.H.
      • Estes III, N.A.
      Diagnosing syncope: Part 2. Unexplained syncope. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians.
      ).
      Figure thumbnail gr3
      Figure 3Algorithm for diagnosing syncope (modified from American College of Cardiologists, 1999). In selective patients should include invasive EP studies. ∗∗Unless syncope occurred in a high-risk setting, e.g. while driving, or caused significant injury. ∗∗∗Including implantable loop recorder; SUO: syncope of undetermined origin.

      Clinical history

      A history taken by an appropriately experienced clinician, and including a witness account, is usually sufficient to secure a diagnosis without the need for detailed investigations. The history should focus on precipitants of the episode (situation and triggers), the premonitory symptoms (prodrome), the characteristics of the episode itself, and the symptoms that follow it (recovery). This must be set against details of previous episodes, past and family history of neurological, cardiac and psychiatric disorders, details of medications, alcohol and illicit drugs, social situation, occupation and driving. Certain points in the history may be used to score the likelihood of syncope or seizure.
      • Sheldon R.
      • Rose S.
      • Ritchie D.
      Historical criteria that distinguish syncope from seizures.
      Patients with a history of prior myocardial infarction, symptoms of congestive cardiac failure or a family history of sudden unexpected death before the age of 40 years should be carefully assessed in view of the real possibility of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

      Indication

      A full and detailed history with witness account is clearly the essential first approach to a patient presenting with blackouts.

      Physical examination

      The pulse rate and rhythm and the BP require particular attention. The supine and standing BP and heart rate is sometimes suggested for all patients with syncope. However, its main value is in patients (usually elderly) with possible orthostatic hypotension. In those with suspected vasovagal syncope, the BP typically remains unchanged or even rises a little on first standing. Blood pressure measured in both arms may help to diagnose brainstem transient ischaemic attacks due to subclavian steal syndrome. Cardiac auscultation is important to identify structural, particularly valvular, heart disease. Carotid sinus massage would not usually be undertaken in a neurology clinic without special arrangements.

      Indication

      In patients presenting with probable syncope, the physical examination should focus on the cardiovascular system; conventional neurological examination is likely to be normal. Positive physical signs consistent with underlying structural heart disease such as a murmur or evidence of heart failure significantly increase the possibility that syncope is due to a cardiac arrhythmia.

      Electrocardiogram (ECG)

      Its main value in syncope is to identify a possible underlying cardiac cause. It identifies the definite cause of syncope in less than 5% of cases.
      • Linzer M.
      • Yang E.H.
      • Estes III, N.A.
      Diagnosing syncope: Part 1. Value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical Efficacy Project of the American College of Physicians.
      • Hammill S.C.
      Value and limitations of non-invasive assessment of syncope.
      Important abnormalities to recognise in a syncope clinic are obvious rhythm disturbances, varying degrees of conduction block (e.g. first degree heart block, bi-fascicular or trifascicular block), and patterns suggesting a predisposition to serious arrhythmias (especially Wolff-Parkinson-White and long QT syndrome). It is particularly important that clinicians investigating syncope recognise the ECG patterns associated with syncope preceding sudden cardiac death (Table 3).
      • Linzer M.
      • Yang E.H.
      • Estes III, N.A.
      Diagnosing syncope: Part 1. Value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical Efficacy Project of the American College of Physicians.
      • Brugada A.
      • Geelen P.
      Some electrocardiographic patterns predicting sudden cardiac death that every doctor should recognise.
      Pathological Q waves signify prior transmural myocardial infarction and imply that the patient has the substrate for scar-related ventricular tachycardia, the commonest cause of sudden cardiac death, frequently preceded by recurrent syncope.
      Table 3ECG markers predicting sudden cardiac death (after Brugada and Geelen
      • Brugada A.
      • Geelen P.
      Some electrocardiographic patterns predicting sudden cardiac death that every doctor should recognise.
      ).
      SyndromeECG pattern
      Long QT syndromeProlonged QT interval
      Wolff-Parkinson-White syndromeShort PR interval, delta wave, wide QRS complex
      Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathyNegative T waves in the right precordial leads, abnormal deflection after the QRS complex (‘epsilon’ wave), incomplete right bundle branch block
      Anterior wall myocardial infarction with right bundle branch blockQ waves in the precordial leads, and right bundle branch block
      Dilated cardiomyopathyLow voltage in the limb and standard leads, with preservation of the voltage in the precordial leads
      Hypertrophic cardiomyopathyHigh QRS voltage, prominent septal Q waves in the lateral leads, and giant negative T waves in the precordial leads
      Brugada syndromeST elevation in V1–V3 and right bundle branch block

      Indication

      ECG is cheap, risk free and identifies significant abnormalities in about 5% of people presenting with syncope. It is therefore recommended in almost all patients presenting with syncope, with the possible exception of young, healthy patients with obvious vasovagal symptoms.

      Echocardiography

      Transthoracic echocardiography in a non-invasive, outpatient test, which should be considered early in the investigation of syncope. Patients with syncope of undetermined origin can, in general, be divided into those with structural heart disease at high risk of sudden cardiac death and those with entirely normal echoradiograms who are usually at low risk of sudden death. Evidence of prior myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease and cardiomyopathies greatly increase the possibility that syncope is due to life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia. SUO in patients with structural heart disease constitute between 3 and 10% of syncope patients. In one-third of these cases syncope is due to ventricular tachycardia; untreated these patients have a 10–20% annual risk of sudden death due to a cardiac arrest.
      • Martin G.J.
      • Adams S.L.
      • Martin H.G.
      • et al.
      Prospective evaluation of syncope.
      • Kapoor W.
      • Karpf M.
      • Wieand S.
      • et al.
      A prospective evaluation and follow-up of patients with syncope.
      • Kapoor W.
      Evaluation and outcome of patients with syncope.
      Therefore, patients with SUO and structural heart disease should be referred for urgent cardiological/electrophysiological assessment. The majority of patients with SUO and apparently normal hearts will have a benign condition such as neurally-mediated syncope. However, if the clinical features are atypical for neurally-mediated syncope and especially if there is family history of sudden premature death, consideration should be given to the possibility of a primary arrhythmia disorder (e.g. congenital LQTS, Brugada syndrome) or conditions which may be difficult to diagnose echocardiographically (e.g. hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy).

      Indication

      Echocardiography is indicated in all patients with syncope of undetermined origin based on a detailed history, physical examination and ECG analysis. In certain circumstances, it should be obtained as a matter of urgency:
      • Structural heart disease, e.g. abnormal cardiovascular examination, abnormal ECG, exercise-induced symptoms, or major cardiac risk factors including age >60 years, smoker, diabetic, hypertensive, hyperlipidaemic patients.
      • Cardiac syncope, e.g. brief syncope with onset from seated or lying posture, absence of prodrome, and rapid recovery. Also cardiac syncope should be considered in older patients or in those with concomitant history of palpitations.
      Echocardiography is also essential before an exercise test, undertaken for exertional syncope.

      Exercise test

      Exercise testing is used routinely in evaluating patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. The role of exercise testing in investigating syncope is not well studied, and the direct yield of identifying an exercise-induced arrhythmia among unselected syncope cases, is probably less than 1%.
      • Kapoor W.N.
      Evaluation and outcome of patients with syncope.
      Targeted use of exercise testing aims to confirm and quantify coronary artery disease in those suspected of having it, and in ruling out coronary disease and exercise-induced arrhythmias in patients presenting with exertional syncope.
      An echocardiogram must precede an exercise test in patients with exertional syncope, to exclude left ventricular obstruction, e.g. aortic stenosis, HCM.

      Indication

      An exercise test is indicated in patients with syncope where
      • the symptoms are associated with exertion, or
      • there is suspected coronary disease.

      Prolonged ECG monitoring

      The gold standard diagnostic test for cardiac syncope is an electrocardiographic recording during a spontaneous syncopal attack. Non-invasive ambulatory monitoring can be prescribed for 24–48 h (Holter monitoring) or for a few weeks (continuous loop recorders). Continuous loop recorder can be patient activated on restoration of consciousness and also may be programmed to autocapture events above or below a programmable heart rate. Certain arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia, if captured on an ambulatory recording, would strongly suggest the cause of a patient’s syncope, even if unaccompanied by typical symptoms during the recording. In general, however, rhythm abnormalities must correlate exactly with symptoms to be considered diagnostic. Healthy asymptomatic individuals may demonstrate periods of second-degree heart block or sinus bradycardia especially while sleeping. Patients with significant structural heart disease and syncope secondary to scar-related ventricular tachycardia may demonstrate asymptomatic episodes of second or third degree heart block, which is a manifestation of widespread myocardial destruction. These patients need careful assessment, as they require not only back-up bradycardia pacing support but also implantable defibrillator therapy. Gibson and Heitzman
      • Gibson T.C.
      • Heitzman M.R.
      Diagnostic efficacy of 24-h electrocardiographic monitoring of syncope.
      found that 19% of syncope patients showed diagnostic changes on Holter monitoring: 4% had typical symptoms with an arrhythmia (true positive: arrhythmogenic syncope diagnosed), and 15% had symptoms without arrhythmia (true negative: arrhythmogenic syncope excluded). One study
      • Bass E.B.
      • Curtiss E.I.
      • Arena V.C.
      • et al.
      The duration of Holter monitoring in syncope: is 24 hours enough?.
      found that continuing the monitoring from 24 to 48 or 72 h identified major arrhythmias in an additional 11 and 15% of patients, respectively; however, these arrhythmias all occurred without typical symptoms.
      For patients with infrequent undiagnosed syncope, a solid-state implantable loop recorder, e.g. Medtronic “Reveal” device, can record a single lead ECG continuously up to 18 months until a symptomatic event is captured. This unit (approximately Math Eq cm) is implanted subcutaneously using local anaesthesia. It can be both patient activated and programmed to autocapture events above or below a programmable heart rate. Patients are reviewed every 3 months or after each syncopal event until a definite diagnosis is made regarding the cardiac rhythm.

      Indication

      Cardiac arrhythmias causing syncope are rare in structurally normal hearts. Thus, ambulatory ECG monitoring (including longer term monitoring) is usually only indicated where
      • syncope occurs with suspected structural heart disease, e.g. abnormal ECG or age over 60 years; or
      • in suspected arrhythmogenic syncope (brief loss of consciousness, palpitation with syncope, absence of prodrome, prompt recovery);
      • syncope in individuals with a family history of premature sudden unexpected death.

      Cardiac electrophysiological (EP) study

      Diagnostic EP studies involve percutaneous placement of electrodes into the heart to assess the cardiac rhythm in response to atrial and ventricular stimulation protocols.
      The procedure is performed under local anaesthesia. Over 90% of patients with re-entrant tachycardia are inducible in the EP lab. In patients with syncope of undetermined origin and structural heart disease such as prior myocardial infarction EP testing plays a useful role in risk stratification. Patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia have a poor prognosis (30% mortality at 3 years) due to a high incidence of cardiac arrest and are usually protected with an implantable defibrillator.
      • Gouello J.P.
      • Victor J.
      • Tades A.
      Natural history of syncope of undetermined origin with inconclusive electrophysiologic examination.
      • Twidale N.
      • Tonkin A.M.
      Clinical electrophysiology study in patients with syncope of undetermined aetiology.
      Patient who are non-inducible have a better survival (10% mortality at 3 years, usually due to non-arrhythmic deaths) and are at low risk for future cardiac arrest. Diagnostic EP studies are performed by placing catheters in the heart via the femoral veins; as the arterial circulation is not entered the risks associated with diagnostic EP studies are substantially less than those associated with diagnostic cardiac catheterisation.

      Indication

      An EP study is indicated in patients with recurrent syncope and structural heart disease.

      Tilt table testing

      Head up passive tilt testing (HUTT) has assisted the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope since 1986.
      • Parry S.W.
      • Kenny R.A.
      Tilt table testing in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope.
      The test protocol typically involves testing the patient in the morning having fasted. After lying supine for 30 min, the patient is tilted to 60–80° for <45 min (strapped in and with arm rest support), and asked to report any symptoms; BP and heart rate are recorded throughout.
      • Razvi S.S.M.
      • Pascual J.
      • Smith P.E.M.
      Tilt table referrals from an epilepsy clinic.
      A test is positive (vasovagal syncope diagnosed) only if the patient’s original pre-syncopal or syncopal symptoms are reproduced entirely, and accompanied by arterial hypotension (BP fall >20 mmHg: vasodepressor response), bradycardia (HR fall >10% baseline: cardio-inhibitory response) or both (mixed response). Haemodynamic changes without symptoms comprise a negative test. If the initial HUTT is non-diagnostic, pharmacological provocations, e.g. nitrates, isoproterenol, can shorten the test duration, though they reduce its specificity. A drug-free HUTT is positive in approximately 50% of patients with suspected vasovagal syncope;
      • Kapoor W.N.
      • Smith M.A.
      • Miller N.L.
      Upright tilt testing in evaluating syncope: a comprehensive literature review.
      medications (e.g. isoproterenol) increase the yield to 64%.
      • Kapoor W.N.
      Using a tilt table to evaluate syncope.
      Relative contraindications to HUTT include proximal coronary artery disease, critical mitral stenosis, clinically severe left ventricular outflow obstruction and severe cerebrovascular disease. HUTT commonly provokes attacks in patients with psychogenic episodes.

      Indication

      HUTT is indicated in patients with recurrent unexplained syncope (likely to be vasovagal) where structural heart disease is either not suspected or has been excluded as the cause. It is indicated after a single episode only if syncope occurred in a high-risk setting, e.g. while driving, or causing significant injury. It may also be helpful even when vasovagal syncope is clinically definite, if demonstration of specific haemodynamic changes might alter management, e.g. permanent pacemaker therapy in cardio-inhibitory vasovagal syncope.
      • Munro N.C.
      • McIntosh S.
      • Lawson J.
      • et al.
      Incidence of complications after carotid sinus massage in older patients with syncope.
      Anecdotally, a positive HUTT helps the patient to understand the symptoms and can lead to improvement in syncope frequency.

      Carotid sinus massage

      Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is diagnosed by recording the heart rate and BP responses to carotid sinus massage, ideally using continuous ECG and phasic BP monitoring. The carotid artery should be auscultated first. Carotid sinus massage should not be attempted in patients with suspected or known carotid vascular disease. With the patient initially supine and the neck slightly extended, the artery is massaged (not compressed) for up to 5 s. If the response is negative or non-diagnostic, the contralateral artery is massaged after 15 s rest. Bilateral simultaneous carotid massage should never be attempted. The incidence of neurological complications of this procedure is very low at around 0.14%.
      • Munro N.C.
      • McIntosh S.
      • Lawson J.
      • et al.
      Incidence of complications after carotid sinus massage in older patients with syncope.
      Carotid sinus syndrome is diagnosed when massage reproduces the patient’s spontaneous symptoms together with asystole for >3 s (cardioinhibitory), a systolic BP fall of >50 mmHg (vasodepressive) or both (mixed).
      • McIntosh S.J.
      • Lawson J.
      • Kenny R.A.
      Clinical characteristics of vasodepressor, cardioinhibitory, and mixed carotid sinus syndrome in the elderly.
      Haemodynamic changes without symptoms (carotid sinus hypersensitivity) comprise a negative test and is inducible in about 10% of the general elderly population.

      Indication

      Carotid sinus massage is indicated in elderly patients with recurrent unexplained syncope or falls (“drop attacks”), especially if the symptoms suggest carotid sinus syndrome.

      Electroencephalogram (EEG)

      Neurological investigations have a generally low yield in patients with syncope, if there are no symptoms or signs suggestive of seizure.
      • Davis T.L.
      • Freemon F.R.
      Electroencephalography should not be routine in the evaluation of syncope in adults.
      Up to 0.5–2% of healthy young adults have epileptiform changes on inter-ictal EEG.

      Indication

      EEG is unnecessary in patients with syncope. However, it may be useful where the diagnosis of syncope is uncertain and a spontaneous epileptic seizure is suspected,

      SIGN (Scottish Intercolligiate Guidelines Network). 2003. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign70.pdf (accessed 25 January 2004).

      especially in a patient below the age of 25 years.

      Simultaneous ECG and EEG monitoring

      Simultaneous ECG and EEG may help to diagnose frequent attacks, which cannot be distinguished as syncope or seizure. Video EEG recording (telemetry) might usefully include an ECG channel in the recording montage to identify accompanying arrhythmias during seizures. Ambulatory EEG and ECG without simultaneous video is less useful, and has other problems including the limited number of available recording channels, and movement artefact that sometimes simulates epileptic activity.

      Indication

      Simultaneously ECG and EEG monitoring may be indicated in patients with frequent attacks, which cannot be distinguished on clinical grounds as either syncope or seizure.

      Brain imaging

      Computed tomography or magnetic resonance brain scans are usually unnecessary for patients presenting with syncope. Intermittent obstructive hydrocephalus caused by structural intracranial lesions is a rare cause of syncope. Seizures with underlying cerebral lesions may occasionally be mistaken for syncope. Day et al. found a diagnostic yield of only 4% among patients presenting to an emergency unit with transient loss of consciousness;
      • Day S.C.
      • Cook E.F.
      • Funkenstein H.
      • et al.
      Evaluation and outcome of emergency room visits with transient loss of consciousness.
      all those with positive findings had either focal neurological findings or a witnessed seizure.

      Indication

      Brain imaging is indicated in patients with syncope only if there is a significant likelihood of seizure, new onset focal neurological symptoms or signs, or if headache consistently precedes the episodes.

      Carotid imaging

      Carotid transient ischaemic attacks are not accompanied by loss of consciousness. Carotid Doppler ultrasonography is not indicated in patients with syncope.

      Autonomic function tests

      Bedside autonomic function tests are helpful to diagnose autonomic dysfunction. The major tests are the supine and erect BP and heart rate at 0, 1 and 2 min. Other simple bedside autonomic function tests include observing heart rate changes (or absence of changes in autonomic neuropathy) on ECG monitoring during the Valsalva manoeuvre, deep breathing or sustained handgrip.

      Low PA. Laboratory evaluation of autonomic function. In: Low PA, editor. Clinical autonomic disorders, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers. p. 179–208.

      Diurnal and environmental factors influence the orthostatic response and so a single BP measurement unchanged by posture does not exclude intermittent orthostatic hypotension.

      Indication

      Bedside autonomic function tests are indicated where syncope occurs immediately on standing (especially in the elderly) or if there are other autonomic symptoms, e.g. dry mouth, urinary urgency/incontinence/retention, impotence, and constipation.

      Hyperventilation test

      Panic disorder and hyperventilation are identified in around a quarter of patients with unexplained syncope.
      • Kapoor W.N.
      • Fortunato M.
      • Hanusa B.H.
      • et al.
      Psychiatric illnesses in patients with syncope.
      It can be helpful (to patient and clinician) to provoke the physical symptoms of hyperventilation in the clinic.
      Hyperventilation testing involves either increasing the ventilation rate to 60 min−1 or simply deep breathing for 3 min.
      • Evans R.W.
      Neurologic aspects of hyperventilation syndrome.
      Dizziness, unsteadiness, and blurred vision commonly develop within 20–30 s, especially when standing; parasthesiae in the fingers and face start later. About half report chest pain after three minutes of hyperventilation. Care is needed in interpreting the result since these symptoms occur in anyone who hyperventilates well. The hyperventilation syndrome is diagnosed only if the patient’s typical symptoms are reproduced by the manoeuvre. For some patients with hyperventilation syndrome, symptoms cannot be reliably reproduced during the hyperventilation test, even on consecutive visits.

      Indication

      A hyperventilation test (usually with a short screening questionnaire for depression, anxiety and panic attacks) is recommended in patients with recurrent unexplained syncope.
      • Linzer M.
      • Felder A.
      • Hackel A.
      • et al.
      Psychiatric syncope: a new look at an old disease.
      The hyperventilation test should not be performed in patients with ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary insufficiency, hyperviscocity states, significant anaemia or uncontrolled hypertension.

      Blood tests

      Routine blood tests, e.g. full blood count, electrolytes, glucose, rarely give diagnostically useful information in patients with syncope
      • Linzer M.
      • Yang E.H.
      • Estes III, N.A.
      Diagnosing syncope: Part 2. Unexplained syncope. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians.
      unless there is clinical suspicion of anaemia or a metabolic disorder. In suspected insulinoma, a 72-h fast typically induces hypoglycaemic attacks with inappropriately high endogenous insulin concentrations.

      Indication

      Metabolic blood tests are only indicated for syncope in special circumstances, e.g. suspected insulinoma.

      Conclusion

      The diagnosis of syncope is critically dependent upon careful history taking—in most patients a diagnosis can be established without complicated and expensive investigations. Nevertheless, an ECG should be routine for all patients presenting with syncope, and clinicians investigating such patients must be familiar with the common and potentially serious ECG abnormalities that may be associated with syncope. Neurologists are likely to be helped by working closely with a cardiologist when investigating syncope. The selection of investigations beyond ECG depends upon the certainty of diagnosis, the frequency and severity of attacks, and the likelihood of an underlying cardiac cause. When cardiac disease is likely, echocardiography, prolonged ECG monitoring, invasive EP studies or exercise testing may be appropriate. Where cardiac disease is not considered the likely cause of syncope, and the episodes are frequent, a head up tilt table test (for vasovagal syncope) may be helpful. If syncope continues despite normal investigations, psychogenic causes should be considered. Despite the wealth of available investigations, however, retaking the history is still likely to be the most valuable investigation in a patient with undiagnosed blackouts.

      References

        • Dermaksian G.
        • Lamb L.E.
        Syncope in a population of healthy young adults.
        JAMA. 1958; 168: 1200-1207
        • Savage D.D.
        • Corwin L.
        • McGee D.L.
        • et al.
        Epidemiologic features of isolated syncope: the Framingham Study.
        Stroke. 1985; 16: 626-629
        • Hauser W.A.
        • Annegers J.F.
        • Kurland L.T.
        The incidence of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1935–84.
        Epilepsia. 1993; 34: 453-468
        • Kapoor W.N.
        Evaluation and outcome of patients with syncope.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 1990; 69: 160-175
        • Chadwick D.
        • Smith D.
        The misdiagnosis of epilepsy.
        BMJ. 2002; 324: 495-496
        • Schnipper J.L.
        • Kapoor W.N.
        Diagnostic evaluation and management of patients with syncope.
        Med. Clin. North Am. 2001; 85: 423-456
        • Smith P.E.M.
        If it’s not epilepsy….
        J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2001; 70: 114-119
        • Sneddon J.F.
        • Scalia G.
        • Ward D.E.
        • et al.
        Exercise induced vasodepressor syncope.
        Br. Heart J. 1994; 71: 554-557
        • Lempert T.
        • Bauer M.
        • Schmidt D.
        Syncope: a videometric analysis of 56 episodes of transient cerebral hypoxia.
        Ann. Neurol. 1994; 36: 233-237
      1. Morley CA, Perrin EJ, Grant et al. Carotid sinus syndrome treated by pacing. Analysis of persistent symptoms and role of atrio-ventricular sequential pacing. Br Heart 1982;47:411–18.

        • Freeman R.
        • Schachter S.C.
        Autonomic epilepsy.
        Semin. Neurol. 1995; 15: 158-166
        • Blumhardt L.D.
        • Smith P.E.M.
        • Owen L.
        Electrocardiographic accompaniments of temporal lobe epileptic seizures.
        Lancet. 1986; 1: 1051-1055
        • Tinuper P.
        • Bisulli F.
        • Cerullo A.
        • et al.
        Ictal bradycardia in partial epileptic seizures: autonomic investigation in three cases and literature review.
        Brain. 2001; 124: 2361-2371
        • Constantin I.
        • Martins J.B.
        • Fincham R.W.
        • et al.
        Bradycardia and syncope as manifestations of partial epilepsy.
        J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1990; 15: 900-905
        • Howell S.J.
        • Blumhardt L.D.
        Cardiac asystole associated with epileptic seizures: a case report with simultaneous EEG and ECG.
        J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1989; 52: 795-798
        • Linzer M.
        • Yang E.H.
        • Estes III, N.A.
        Diagnosing syncope: Part 1. Value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical Efficacy Project of the American College of Physicians.
        Ann. Intern. Med. 1997; 126: 989-996
        • Linzer M.
        • Yang E.H.
        • Estes III, N.A.
        Diagnosing syncope: Part 2. Unexplained syncope. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians.
        Ann. Intern. Med. 1997; 127: 76-86
        • Sheldon R.
        • Rose S.
        • Ritchie D.
        Historical criteria that distinguish syncope from seizures.
        J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002; 40: 142-148
        • Hammill S.C.
        Value and limitations of non-invasive assessment of syncope.
        Cardiol. Clin. 1997; 15: 195-218
        • Brugada A.
        • Geelen P.
        Some electrocardiographic patterns predicting sudden cardiac death that every doctor should recognise.
        Acta Cardiologica. 1997; 6: 473-484
        • Martin G.J.
        • Adams S.L.
        • Martin H.G.
        • et al.
        Prospective evaluation of syncope.
        Ann. Emerg. Med. 1984; 13: 499-504
        • Kapoor W.
        • Karpf M.
        • Wieand S.
        • et al.
        A prospective evaluation and follow-up of patients with syncope.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1983; 309: 197-204
        • Kapoor W.
        Evaluation and outcome of patients with syncope.
        Medicine. 1990; 69: 169-175
        • Gibson T.C.
        • Heitzman M.R.
        Diagnostic efficacy of 24-h electrocardiographic monitoring of syncope.
        Am. J. Cardiol. 1984; 53: 1013-1017
        • Bass E.B.
        • Curtiss E.I.
        • Arena V.C.
        • et al.
        The duration of Holter monitoring in syncope: is 24 hours enough?.
        Arch. Intern. Med. 1990; 150: 1073-1078
        • Gouello J.P.
        • Victor J.
        • Tades A.
        Natural history of syncope of undetermined origin with inconclusive electrophysiologic examination.
        Arch. Mal. Coeur. 1992; 85: 297-302
        • Twidale N.
        • Tonkin A.M.
        Clinical electrophysiology study in patients with syncope of undetermined aetiology.
        Aust. NZ J. Med. 1987; 17: 512-517
        • Parry S.W.
        • Kenny R.A.
        Tilt table testing in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope.
        Q. J. Med. 1999; 92: 623-629
        • Razvi S.S.M.
        • Pascual J.
        • Smith P.E.M.
        Tilt table referrals from an epilepsy clinic.
        Seizure. 2003; 12: 295-299
        • Kapoor W.N.
        • Smith M.A.
        • Miller N.L.
        Upright tilt testing in evaluating syncope: a comprehensive literature review.
        Am. J. Med. 1994; 97: 78-88
        • Kapoor W.N.
        Using a tilt table to evaluate syncope.
        Am. J. Med. Sci. 1999; 317: 110-116
        • Munro N.C.
        • McIntosh S.
        • Lawson J.
        • et al.
        Incidence of complications after carotid sinus massage in older patients with syncope.
        J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1994; 42: 1248-1251
        • McIntosh S.J.
        • Lawson J.
        • Kenny R.A.
        Clinical characteristics of vasodepressor, cardioinhibitory, and mixed carotid sinus syndrome in the elderly.
        Am. J. Med. 1993; 95: 203-208
        • Davis T.L.
        • Freemon F.R.
        Electroencephalography should not be routine in the evaluation of syncope in adults.
        Arch. Intern Med. 1990; 150: 2027-2029
      2. SIGN (Scottish Intercolligiate Guidelines Network). 2003. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign70.pdf (accessed 25 January 2004).

        • Day S.C.
        • Cook E.F.
        • Funkenstein H.
        • et al.
        Evaluation and outcome of emergency room visits with transient loss of consciousness.
        Am. J. Med. 1992; 73: 15-23
      3. Low PA. Laboratory evaluation of autonomic function. In: Low PA, editor. Clinical autonomic disorders, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers. p. 179–208.

        • Kapoor W.N.
        • Fortunato M.
        • Hanusa B.H.
        • et al.
        Psychiatric illnesses in patients with syncope.
        Am. J. Med. 1995; 99: 505-512
        • Evans R.W.
        Neurologic aspects of hyperventilation syndrome.
        Semin. Neurol. 1995; 15: 115-125
        • Linzer M.
        • Felder A.
        • Hackel A.
        • et al.
        Psychiatric syncope: a new look at an old disease.
        Psychosomatics. 1990; 31: 181-188